US rebound, weekly losses
The S&P 500 lost 2.68% and the Nasdaq Composite 3.37%. Both rose on Friday; the Dow fell. One recovery session does not establish a trend reversal.
The US midterms shifted expectations for data centres and the Middle East conflict. Stocks responded very differently. Friday’s rebound did not erase the week’s losses.
Final data: November 6, after the US close · Europe/Berlin
The S&P 500 lost 2.68% and the Nasdaq Composite 3.37%. Both rose on Friday; the Dow fell. One recovery session does not establish a trend reversal.
SMH fell 11.20%, Nvidia 8.80% and Vertiv 21.35%. Potential permitting and regulatory constraints were the issue—not demonstrated order collapses.
WTI dropped 12.76% to $90.83. Hopes of Middle East de-escalation weighed on energy stocks. Continued vessel attacks ruled out an unqualified all-clear.
US payrolls rose by 165,000 and unemployment fell to 4.1%. The 10-year yield nevertheless ended below the previous Friday, while the dollar strengthened.
The Hang Seng gained 5.10%, the Euro Stoxx 50 0.64% and Amazon 7.88%. This was a sharp repricing of different earnings and policy risks, not a uniform flight from equities.
Weekly returns compare the adjusted close on October 30 with the final close on November 6. The DAX was effectively flat at +0.0083%; its 1.92% Friday decline must not be confused with its weekly result. The Nasdaq Composite, QQQ and SMH hold different portfolios and are not interchangeable.
Swipe horizontally to read the full chart.
| Market / instrument | Closing level | Week | Friday |
|---|---|---|---|
| S&P 500 | 7,376.86 | −2.68% | +0.31% |
| Nasdaq Composite | 24,579.43 | −3.37% | +1.09% |
| Dow Jones | 51,285.73 | −0.94% | −0.46% |
| Russell 2000 | 2,754.11 | −2.05% | +0.89% |
| DAX | 25,820.36 | +0.01% | −1.92% |
| Euro Stoxx 50 | 6,170.49 | +0.64% | −0.98% |
| Stoxx 600 | 648.33 | +0.24% | −1.00% |
| Nikkei 225 | 57,434.77 | −9.25% | −5.96% |
| KOSPI | 5,059.69 | −11.71% | −6.02% |
| Hang Seng | 24,481.86 | +5.10% | −1.27% |
Closing level: 7,376.86
Week: −2.68% · Friday: +0.31%
Closing level: 24,579.43
Week: −3.37% · Friday: +1.09%
Closing level: 51,285.73
Week: −0.94% · Friday: −0.46%
Closing level: 2,754.11
Week: −2.05% · Friday: +0.89%
Closing level: 25,820.36
Week: +0.01% · Friday: −1.92%
Closing level: 6,170.49
Week: +0.64% · Friday: −0.98%
Closing level: 648.33
Week: +0.24% · Friday: −1.00%
Closing level: 57,434.77
Week: −9.25% · Friday: −5.96%
Closing level: 5,059.69
Week: −11.71% · Friday: −6.02%
Closing level: 24,481.86
Week: +5.10% · Friday: −1.27%
Indices in points; US stocks and ETFs in US dollars; WTI in US dollars per barrel and gold per troy ounce. Commodities use continuous futures series, not spot prices. The DAX and US indices apply different dividend conventions; these returns are not a currency-adjusted total return for a uniform portfolio.
Expectations of tougher AI oversight → slower permitting or higher site costs → later revenue and lower returns on capital → pressure on chips, cooling and data-centre development.
Observed: Nvidia, Oracle and Vertiv fell sharply. That did not mean a nationwide construction ban had been enacted. The repricing concerned expected timelines and the value of future profits.
Hopes of de-escalation → fewer expected supply disruptions → a lower oil premium → less inflation and lower consumer-sector costs, but weaker producer earnings.
Observed: WTI and XLE fell sharply. Benefits to other industries are a possible transmission channel, not proof that every consumer or transport stock gained.
More jobs and lower unemployment → stronger household income → less immediate recession pressure, but also less reason for rapid rate cuts.
Observed: the dollar rose and the 10-year yield edged up on Friday, yet finished below its prior-week close. Growth signals and demand for safety operated at the same time.
Revenue growth → operating margin → capital spending → free cash flow. The final step reveals how much cash remains for investors after expansion.
A larger order book alone removes neither permitting risk nor funding needs. Conversely, a falling share price does not prove an operating demand collapse.
The November 6 US employment report showed 165,000 additional jobs in October and a 4.1% unemployment rate. Reuters also reported annual wage growth of 3.1%. These figures argue against an abrupt demand collapse, but do not guarantee falling inflation.
Equities face a tension: resilient incomes support revenue, while persistent price pressure can keep discount rates elevated. The discount rate converts future profits into present value. Highly valued growth stocks are especially sensitive to changes in that assumption.
The snapshot’s 10-year yield fell from 4.929% to 4.859%, a decline of 7 basis points. One basis point equals 0.01 percentage point. The dollar index rose 0.41% and gold futures 4.51%, while the long-duration Treasury ETF TLT gained just 0.10%.
This is consistent with intermittent demand for safety, not a simple story of broad rate relief. The 10-year yield represents only one point on the yield curve; it cannot establish a new inversion or steepening. TLT also has a different maturity profile from the 10-year note.
The Fed, ECB and BoJ made their latest decisions before this reporting week. The Fed held at 3.75–4.00% on October 28; the ECB kept its deposit rate at 2.50% on October 29; the BoJ maintained a policy rate around 1.25% on October 30. These decisions are background, not new November catalysts.
There was a fresh decision in Britain on November 5: the Bank of England raised its policy rate by 25 basis points to 4.00%. Differing inflation conditions therefore prevent a synchronised global easing cycle. For Europe, energy prices and funding costs remain important but separate earnings levers.
Swipe horizontally to read the full chart.
Swipe horizontally to read the full chart.
Reuters linked the selloff to Democratic gains in the US midterms and the prospect of closer scrutiny of AI and data centres. Expected policy must be distinguished from laws already in force. Prices reflected possible delays, not a verified nationwide wave of cancellations.
For Nvidia, the channel runs through customers’ demand for computing capacity. For Vertiv it concerns cooling and power equipment; for Oracle, the economics and financing of its own infrastructure also matter. Falling together does not establish an identical operating cause.
Qualcomm reported on November 4: adjusted revenue of $10.442 billion and adjusted earnings per share of $2.17. Handset revenue fell 26%, while automotive revenue rose 89%. Strong automotive growth does not automatically offset weakness in the larger handset business.
Next-quarter guidance was $10.4–11.2 billion in revenue and $2.15–2.35 in adjusted earnings per share. The stock rose 5.52% on Friday, but just 0.38% across the week. That later rebound is not the same as the immediate earnings reaction.
Amazon’s October 29 results showed $201.9 billion in sales and 39.3% AWS growth. Yet trailing-12-month free cash flow was negative $42.4 billion. Free cash flow is operating cash left after investment: rapid growth and substantial funding needs can coexist.
Vertiv had reported 61% sales growth and organic order growth above 100% on October 28. Its subsequent 21.35% weekly share-price decline is therefore not evidence that those reported operating figures collapsed. Both releases provide valuation context; neither was a new result in this reporting week.
Cloud growth meets heavy investment. A positive week does not establish that the cash-flow tension has been resolved.
Relative strength versus the Nasdaq is observable. Without a separate current release, it is not fresh operating evidence.
The risk concerns the pace of infrastructure deployment. The price decline does not demonstrate cancelled orders.
Later utilisation can hurt returns on capital-intensive data centres; funding and customer revenue remain central.
Strong prior-week results and a falling share price illustrate the difference between current figures and future valuation.
Automotive growth and handset weakness need separate analysis; Friday and the weekly return tell different stories.
Reuters reported that Republican election losses raised hopes of greater political pressure to de-escalate the US–Israeli war with Iran. The prospect of more regional exports and falling physical crude premiums provided a plausible supply channel. WTI lost 12.76% across the week; Exxon Mobil fell 11.42%.
For producers, a lower selling price directly affects revenue and cash flow. Cheaper oil can lower costs elsewhere, but the benefit depends on hedging, pricing power and demand. Falling oil is therefore not an unqualified signal of stronger growth.
At the same time, Reuters reported further tanker attacks in the Gulf and Strait of Hormuz. Political hope does not create a secure shipping route. New disruptions could rapidly restore the risk premium and reverse the apparent inflation benefit.
Next week, actual transport volumes, insurance and freight costs, and confirmed diplomatic steps matter more than another headline about possible calm. The next EIA Short-Term Energy Outlook is scheduled for November 10.
The Nikkei and KOSPI fell 9.25% and 11.71%, respectively, with each losing roughly 6% on Friday alone. Reuters linked the declines to AI-investment fears, semiconductor exposure and selling amplified in part by margin calls. These force leveraged positions to be sold to meet collateral requirements.
The political catalyst therefore hit an already vulnerable investment trade. It does not establish an equally large deterioration in Asian economies or chip orders. Calmer funding conditions and less forced selling would matter more for stabilisation than one positive US session.
The Hang Seng gained 5.10% across the week but lost 1.27% on Friday. Earlier Reuters coverage described selective buying of Chinese internet platforms and relative-valuation appeal. This suggests differentiation within technology, not proof that money sold in Japan flowed directly into Hong Kong.
The Euro Stoxx 50 and Stoxx 600 ended modestly higher, while the DAX was effectively flat. All three declined on Friday. Europe’s relative resilience is observable; attributing it exclusively to cheaper oil would go too far without detailed sector-contribution data.
Investors distinguish platform revenue from capital-intensive expansion. US inflation data do not deliver a major adverse surprise, and policy proposals become more concrete. Friday develops into stabilisation, not an immediate broad recovery.
Confirmation: smaller swings in chips and Asian equities; no renewed oil risk premium.
Specific exemptions or workable permitting timelines temper fears of a construction freeze. Softer inflation also eases discount-rate pressure. Heavily sold infrastructure names could respond disproportionately.
Reality check: participation must broaden beyond short covering.
Sticky inflation coincides with tougher construction or power-supply requirements. Higher funding costs and delayed utilisation weigh on free cash flow. Renewed attacks on oil shipping would add inflation pressure.
Warning: chips keep falling despite stable rates, or oil and yields rise together. Weekly returns do not provide scenario probabilities.
Scenarios are conditional developments, not price targets or investment recommendations. Dates follow calendars available at the editorial cutoff and may change.
The BLS calendar lists October CPI. Core inflation, service prices and the yield response matter more than a single headline number.
The EIA outlook and BoJ Summary of Opinions may refine supply assumptions and Japan’s policy debate. Publications are not fresh rate decisions.
The first third-quarter GDP estimate will show the economic backdrop to the latest rate increase.
PPI adds to the inflation picture. Also watch confirmed data-centre rules, corporate comments on orders and funding, and actual oil-transport disruptions.
Market prices: Yahoo Finance adjusted daily series in the SmartDeer market snapshot. End date November 6, 2026; comparison October 30. News and operating figures: the original releases and Reuters reports below. Intraday media prices did not replace final closing data.
This free report is for information and education only. It is not investment advice, a personal recommendation or an offer to buy or sell securities. Markets, policy assumptions and data can change. Past price performance is not a reliable indicator of future results.